Why Meal Replacements?

Gina Mantor • Feb 03, 2020

Benefit of Meal Replacements in Weight Management

White Paper
www.Robard.com
BENEFIT OF MEAL REPLACEMENTS IN WEIGHT MANAGEMENT
The benefit of replacing grocery foods with balanced nutritional Meal Replacements is a useful clinical tool
to support calorie restriction and provide optimal levels of macro and micro nutrients. It is known that
incorporation of added protein during calorie restriction aids in satiety as well as supporting lean body mass
and metabolic rate.
In 2009 the American Dietetic Association supported inclusion of Meal Replacements in their position statement
on Weight Mangement.1 It was reported that Meal replacements, containing known energy and macronutrient
contents, are a useful strategy to eliminate problematic food choices or complex meal planning while trying to
attain a daily caloric deficit. Substituting one or two daily meals or snacks with meal replacements in the form
of liquid meals, meal bars or calorie-controlled packaged meals may be used as part of the comprehensive
weight management program.
In a review by Hymesfield, randomized controlled studies that used meal replacements for at least three months
were compared to a conventional reduced calorie diet. It was determined that while both groups lost weight,
dieters using of meal replacements lost more weight after 1 year.2 Weight loss after one year averaged 7-8% from
base line which was comparable or above the level observed with pharmacologic weight loss studies and the
level known to lower disease risk.
Meal replacements have also been an effective alternative for dieters with diabetes. In addition to simplifying
meal planning it can help dieters achieve healthy blood glucose levels while they are learning skills to
balance their dietary carbohydrate intake. Cheskin et.al.3 reported that a diet using a portion-controlled meal
replacement diet (PCD) yielded significantly greater initial weight loss and less regain after 1 year of maintenance
than a standard, self-selected, food-based diet.
Meal replacements were also utilized in the multi-center Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study4
with over 5000 participants. During the weight loss phase it was found that the number of meal replacements
consumed was significantly associated the amount of weight loss. At the end of one year the group using meal
replacements lost 6.8% of their initial weight compared to only 0.7% for the group without meal replacement
use. After initial weight loss participants in this multi-year study were encouraged to continue to replace one
meal and one snack per day with liquid shakes and meal bars.
Weight loss maintenance is another good fit for meal replacements. Continuing to substitute a meal
replacement for one or two daily meals or snacks has been found to support long term weight maintenance.5
REFERENCES:
1. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Weight Management Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2009; 109;330-346.
2. Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from
six studies. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2003 May;27(5):537-49.
3. Cheskin LJ, Mitchell AM, Jhaveri AD, Mitola AH, Davis LM, Lewis RL, Yep MA, Lycan TW. Efficacy of Meal Replacements Versus a Standard Food-Based Diet for
Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2008; 34: 118-127.
4. Wadden TA, Neiberg RH, Wing RR, Clark JM, Delahanty LM, Hill JO, Krakoff J, Otto A, Ryan DH, Vitolins MZ; Look AHEAD Research Group. One Year Weight
Losses in the Look AHEAD Study: Factors Associated with Success Obesity. 2009; 17: 713-722
5. Layman DK, Evans EM, Erickson D, Seyler J, Weber J, Bagshaw D, Griel A, Psota T, Kris-Etherton P. A moderate-protein diet produces sustained weight loss and
long-term changes in body composition and blood lipids in obese adults. Journal of Nutrition. 2009. 139(3):514-21.
rev. 011218 M8WP02 D
IMPORTANCE OF MEAL REPLACEMENTS IN WEIGHT MANAGEMENT
A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice.
(Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, Vetter ML, Tsai AG, Berkowitz RI, Kumanyika S, Schmitz KH, Diewald LK, Barg R, Chittams J, Moore RH. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1969-79.)
Primary care physicians (PCPs), collaborating with medical assistants, helped obese patients lose an average of 4.7% of their initial weight at 24 months. This loss, which was accompanied by improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, was achieved with enhanced brief lifestyle counseling, which combined quarterly PCP visits, brief lifestyle coaching delivered monthly, and provided for the use of meal replacements to enhance weight loss.
Effect of a conventional energy-restricted modified diet with or without meal replacement on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk profile in overweight women.
(Metzner CE, Folberth-Vögele A, Bitterlich N, Lemperle M, Schäfer S, Alteheld B, Stehle P, Siener R. Nutrition & Metabolism 2011 Sep 22;8(1):64.)
Compliance was higher in the meal replacement group than in the conventional diet group as demonstrated by the higher weight loss. In the meal replacement group 77% of participants lost more than 5% of their total weight in 12 weeks vs. only 50% in the conventional diet group while following a 1200 calorie diet. The average weight loss and percent body fat loss was higher with meal replacement vs. conventional diet.
Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial.
(Davis LM, Coleman C, Kiel J, Rampolla J, Hutchisen T, Ford L, Andersen WS, Hanlon-Mitola A. Nutrition Journal. 2010;9:11.)
A meal replacement diet plan of a fixed macronutrient composition yielded clinically significant weight loss for 93% of obese participants. The intervention with meal replacements yielded changes in body composition that favorably impacted many cardiovascular health outcomes. The meal replacement diet plan evaluated is an effective strategy for producing robust initial weight loss, and for achieving improvements in a number of health parameters during weight maintenance, including inflammation and oxidative stress, two key factors recently understood to underlie our most common chronic diseases.
Meal replacements and energy balance.
(Heymsfield SR. Physiology and Behavior. 2010; 100: 90-94.)
This collective information supports the view that meal replacements, particularly in beverage form, are now an effective and safe component for use in the clinical setting. Several studies suggest that the addition of a partial meal replacements (PMR) to pharmacotherapy may be additive for weight loss.
Position of the american dietetic association: weight management
(Seagle HM, Witt Strain G, Makris A, Reeves R. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2009; 109;330-346.)
Individuals adhering to structured meal replacement plans lose more weight at both 12 weeks and one year than individuals following a conventional diet plan, with one year dropout rates for the structured meal replacement plan significantly less than the conventional diet plan.
One year weight losses in the look ahead study: factors associated with success
(Wadden TA, Neiberg RH, Wing RR, Clark JM, Delahanty LM, Hill JO, Krakoff J, Otto A, Ryan DH, Vitolins MZ; Look AHEAD Research Group. Obesity. 2009; 17: 713-722.)
The numbers of meal replacements consumed in the first six months was significantly related to weight loss at week 26 as was the total number consumed for the year to weight loss at week 52. At the end of year one, the intensive lifestyle group using meal replacements lost 8.6% of their initial weight compared to 0.7% for the group receiving diabetes support and education.
Efficacy of meal replacements versus a standard food-based diet for weight loss in type 2 diabetes.
(Cheskin LJ, Mitchell AM, Jhaveri AD, Mitola AH, Davis LM, Lewis RL, Yep MA, Lycan TW. The Diabetes Educator. 2008; 34: 118-127.)
A diet using portion-controlled meal replacements (PCD) yielded significantly greater initial weight loss and less regain after 1 year of maintenance than a standard, self-selected, food-based diet. As PCDs may help obese patients with type 2 diabetes adhere to a weight control program, diabetes educators may consider recommending them as part of a comprehensive approach to weight control.
800.222.9201 | www.Robard.com
Should overweight and obese primary care patients be offered a meal replacement diet?
(Rohrer JE, Takahashi P. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice. 2008; 2: 263-268.)
The average adult primary care patient who receives a single motivational interview can lose about 3 kg in 1
month using meal replacements. The diet was 1200 cal per day using pre-packaged foods for all calories other
than fresh fruits and vegetables. Subjects were told that fresh vegetables and fruits were ‘free’ and did not
count against their calorie budgets. Individual servings of snacks or desserts were acceptable as were frozen
meals. No particular brand was recommended.
Effect of meal replacement on metabolic risk factors in overweight and obese subjects.
(König D, Deibert P, Frey I, Landmann U, Berg A. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008;52(1):74-8.)
Even over a short period of time, a meal replacement diet is more effective in reducing metabolic risk factors,
insulin, and leptin, and in improving anthropometric measures than a fat-restricted low-calorie diet. Meal replacment
subjects showed a stronger improvement in metabolic risk factors and a 12% reduction in the prevalence
of the metabolic syndrome.
Meal replacements double weight loss, support maintenance.
(Tucker M. Family Practice News, DEC 2008.)
“Meal replacements are considered state-of-the-art dietary treatment for overweight and obesity. They produce
double the weight loss of traditional weight loss plans and they improve long-term maintenance,“ reported by
Anne Daly at the annual meeting of the American Association of Diabetes Educators.
The evolution of very-low-calorie-diets: an update and meta-analysis.
(Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Obesity. 2006; 14: 1283-93.)
Partial meal replacement plans facilitate greater weight loss than the prescription of equivalent-calorie diets
with conventional foods.
Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies.
(Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2003 May;27(5):537-49.)
Based on the review of randomized controlled trials, utilizing partial meal replacement plans for weight management
indicates that these types of interventions can safely and effectively produce significant sustainable
weight loss and improve weight-related risk factors of disease.
Value of structured meals for weight management: risk factors and long-term weight maintenance
(Ditschunett, Herwig and Marion Flechtner-Mors. Obesity Research. 2001; 9: 284S-289S.)
For two groups, one with a 1,200-1,500 calorie diet and another with a diet using 2 or 3 meal replacements, the
differences were significant. The first group lost an average of 1.5 pounds over 3 months and 3.3 pound after 4
years. The second group lost 7.8 pounds after 3 months and 8.4 pound after 4 years.
Meal replacements in weight intervention
(Judith M. Ashley JM, St. Jeor ST, Suzanne Perumean-Chaney S, Jon Schrage J, Bovee V. Obesity Research (2001) 9, s312–S320.)
Traditional weight loss intervention incorporating MRs was effective as a weight loss tool in the medical office
practice and in the dietitian-led group setting. Meal replacements provide a structured eating pattern that is
easy to comply with and that can improve the magnitude of weight loss compared with a traditional diet and
provides physicians with practical tool with ease of explanation that is effective with patients. In addition,
incorporating a MR strategy into a traditional weight management program can improve food choice behavior
and nutrient adequacy, even while following a reduced energy intake.
By Gina Mantor 01 Feb, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Gina Mantor 25 Jan, 2024
In the News Recent case reports have raised the possibility that semaglutide—a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist— could be tied to a higher risk of suicidal ideation . But a retrospective study that included about 241 000 patients with overweight or obesity as well as about 1.6 million patients with type 2 diabetes did not confirm that link. Instead, researchers found the opposite. People taking semaglutide had a lower risk of both first-time and recurrent suicidal ideation compared with those taking non–GLP-1 receptor agonists to manage obesity, such as phentermine, as well as those used to manage type 2 diabetes, such as metformin. Because it was retrospective, the current study could not establish a causal link between semaglutide and the lower risk of suicidal ideation, the researchers—including Nora Volkow, MD, the director of the US National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health—wrote in Nature Medicine. They also noted the need for additional controlled trials to better understand the relationship. 
#medicalspa #physician #drginamantor #emsella #thursday #kegelthrone #emsellachair
By Gina Mantor 14 Jan, 2024
Say Goodbye to Urinary Incontinence and Reclaim Your Freedom with Emsella Treatment! Are you someone who plans your activities around accessible restrooms? Do you avoid exercise for fear of urinary leakage? Don't suffer silently anymore. Emsella, also known as "The Kegel Throne," is a revolutionary treatment that can help you reclaim your freedom. Sitting fully clothed in a treatment chair for less than 30 minutes, Emsella strengthens your pelvic floor and improves your intimate health. This therapy is now available at a discounted price of just $494 for six 30-minute treatment sessions, previously valued at $1,800. You can schedule a free trial session and consultation by calling us at 614.891.2000 or visiting our website. Monthly payment plans are also available. Our double-board certified physician, Dr. Gina Mantor, is certified in internal medicine and obesity medicine. She is also an advisory board member of the Menopause Association. Take the first step toward freedom from urinary incontinence toda
Incontinence Treatment EMSELLA, Non-Invasive, No Surgery Required, FDA-Cleared
By websitebuilder 23 Dec, 2023
Dr. Mantor's Wrinkle and Weight Solutions, LLC in Columbus, Ohio introduces Groundbreaking and Completely Non-Invasive Treatment for Incontinence in Women New BTL EMSELLA™ offering makes treating incontinence as easy as sitting in a chair. BTL EMSELLA™ the first of it's kind-- the only device available to target a woman’s entire pelvic floor region for the treatment of incontinence. This unique technology revolutionizes the women’s intimate health and wellness category by providing those suffering from incontinence with a completely non-invasive option. The “chair” design of the device itself allows women to remain fully clothed for treatment, with no pain or downtime, so patients can walk out immediately following treatment. “We’re thrilled to be able to offer our patients the BTL EMSELLA treatment as it offers maximum results with no surgery needed,” shared Dr. Gina Mantor “This is truly revolutionary as up until now, invasive treatments have been the only option to effectively address these serious issues, so we’re delighted to finally have an efficacious treatment solution that is truly non-invasive.” Statistics show that approximately 35% of women worldwide are affected by urinary incontinence, which presents itself in three forms: stress (leakage during physical activity), urge (strong & sudden), and mixed (combination of stress and urge). Incontinence is often a result of child birth and/or the natural aging process, and can have a dramatic effect on a woman’s quality of life. Women often report having to give up exercise and a decrease in self-confidence and intimacy as a result of incontinence. Harnessing the power of HIFEM (High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic) technology, BTL EMSELLA™ stimulates the entire pelvic floor at once—with a single session providing thousands of supramaximal pelvic floor muscle contractions, comparable to thousands of Kegels. A recent clinical study demonstrated that 95% of patients treated reported satisfaction and significant improvement in their quality of life following six treatments with BTL EMSELLA™ . Additionally, 67% of treated patients totally eliminated or decreased the use of hygienic pads in day-to-day life. 1 For optimal results with BTL EMSELLA™, Dr. Gina Mantor recommends a series of six, twice –weekly, 28 minute treatments. Dr. Mantor's Wrinkle and Weight Solutions, LLC is offering VERY SPECIAL pricing right now through January 15, 2021. We know many of you may be busy with holidays and may not be able to get in immediately so if you would like to take advantage of this unbelievable deal you can purchase this package and it will be on your file to be used at a later date. This is an unbelievable special and if you want to discuss with Dr. Mantor to see if it is right for you, you can schedule a free televideo consult or in person consultation at your earliest convenience. We do offer gift cards as well if you would like to ask for something you really need!! 6 Treatments regularly $1800 Now ONLY $599 (Less than $100 per Treatment!) Call today to schedule! 614-891-2000 or book online 24/7 @ www.WrinkleandWeight.com Dr. Mantor’s Wrinkle and Weight Solutions Staff and Gina K Mantor, MD Double Board Certified, American Board of Internal Medicine and American Board of Obesity Medicine, Master Injector, Aesthetic Medicine, Holding Multiple Advanced Certifications, Medical Director Cardiopulmonary Services, COPC Dr. Mantor’s Wrinkle & Weight Solutions,LLC www.WrinkleandWeight.com 614-891-2000, fax 614-895-2568 drginamantor@wrinkleandweight.com #westervilleohio #614columbus #explore614 #uptownwesterville #aesthetics #medicalspa #drginamantor #wrinkleandweight #explore614 #614 #medispa #columbusaesthetics #columbusbotox #demalfillers #bodysculpting #weightlossjourney #ylift #emsculpt #emsculptneo #lashliftandtint #chemicalpeels #obagi #skinmedica #polaris #wellness #lipfiller #injectables #botox #incontinencesolutions #wellness #womenshealth #menshealth
By Gina Mantor 13 Dec, 2023
New Beauty Reports on the Popularity of Thread Lifts!
By Gina Mantor 02 Dec, 2023
BTL AESTHETICS INTRODUCES A NEW EMSCULPT NEO EDGE™ APPLICATOR FOR THE LATERAL ABDOMEN COMING TO DR. MANTOR'S WRINKLE AND WEIGHT SOLUTIONS!
02 Oct, 2023
The recently licensed weight-loss drug semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk) "is likely to usher in a new era in the medical treatment of obesity ," stated Lee M. Kaplan, MD, PhD, at the virtual American Diabetes Association (ADA) 81st Scientific Sessions. Kaplan discussed the clinical implications of caring for patients with obesity now that the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist is approved in the United States for weight loss. Weight loss with semaglutide 2.4 mg was twice that achieved with liraglutide 3 mg (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk) — that is, roughly a 10% to 15% weight loss at 68 weeks, said Kaplan, who was not involved in the pivotal STEP clinical trials of the agent. "I think as we start to see more data come in over the next couple of years," including from the cardiovascular outcome trial SELECT, he continued, "we'll be able to use the data to create a nuanced [individualized patient treatment] approach, but we'll also be able to use our clinical experience, which will grow rapidly over the next few years." In future, semaglutide is likely to be combined with other drugs to provide even greater weight loss, predicts Kaplan, director of the Obesity, Metabolism, and Nutrition Institute at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In the meantime, "to be effective, semaglutide needs to be used," he stressed, while noting that responses to the drug vary by individual, and so this will need to be taken into account. "Obesity needs to be recognized as a disease in its own right, as well as a risk factor for numerous other diseases, [and] equitable access to obesity treatment needs to be broadened," he emphasized. Four Pivotal Phase 3 trials As previously reported, four pivotal 68-week, phase 3 clinical trials in the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People With Obesity (STEP) program tested the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg/week in more than 4500 adults with overweight or obesity. The trials have been published in high profile journals — the New England Journal of Medicine ( STEP 1 ), The Lancet ( STEP 2 ), and JAMA ( STEP 3 , STEP 4 ) — said Robert F. Kushner, MD. "I would encourage all of you to download and read each of these trials on your own," said Kushner, professor of medicine and medicine education at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in Chicago, Illinois, and coauthor of STEP 1, before presenting a top-level review of key results. STEP 1 examined weight management, STEP 3 added a background of intensive behavioral therapy, STEP 4 investigated sustained weight management, and STEP 2 (unlike the others) investigated weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes , he summarized. In STEP 1, patients who received semaglutide had an average 15% weight loss, and those who stayed on the drug had a 17% weight loss, compared with the 2.4% weight loss in the placebo group. "One third of individuals in the trial achieved at least a 20% weight loss or more," Kushner said, which is "really phenomenal." The results of STEP 3 "suggest that semaglutide with monthly brief lifestyle counseling alone is sufficient to produce a mean weight loss of 15%," he noted, as adding a low-calorie diet and intensive behavior therapy sped up the initial weight loss but did not increase the final weight loss. A post-hoc analysis of STEP 2 showed "it's clear that improvement in A1c " is greater with at least a 10% weight loss versus a smaller weight loss, Kushner said. A1c dropped by 2.2% versus 1.3%, with these two weight losses respectively. In STEP 4, after dose escalation to 2.4 mg at 20 weeks, patients had lost 10.6% of their initial weight. At 68 weeks, those who were switched to placebo at 20 weeks had lost 5.4% of their initial weight, whereas those who remained on semaglutide had lost 17.7% of their initial weight. This shows that "if you remove the drug, the disease starts to come back," Kushner pointed out. Nausea, the most common side effect, occurred in 20% of patients, but was mostly mild or moderate, and gastrointestinal effects including constipation , vomiting, and diarrhea were transient and occurred early in the dose escalation phase. Large Individual Variability, Combination Therapies on Horizon Kaplan pointed out, however, that "like [with] other anti-obesity therapies...there's a large patient-to-patient variability." A third of patients exhibit more than 20% weight loss, and 10% exhibit more than 30% weight loss — approaching the efficacy of b ariatric surgery . However, nearly 10% of patients without diabetes and upwards of 30% of patients with diabetes will experience less than 5% weight loss, he said. Therefore, "success or failure in one patient doesn't predict response in another, and we should always remember that as we treat different patients with these medications," Kaplan advised clinicians. A recent phase 1b study suggests that combination therapy with semaglutide and the amylin agonist cagrilintide ups weight loss, as previously reported . In this short trial with no lifestyle modification, it took 16 weeks for patients to reach full dosing, and at 20 weeks, patients on semaglutide had lost 8% of their initial weight, whereas those on combination therapy had lost 17% of their initial weight. "There's hope that, in combination with cagrilintide and probably with several other agents that are still in early development, we'll be seeing average weight loss that is in the range of that seen with bariatric surgery," Kushner said. Case 1 ou have a patient with type 2 diabetes, a body mass index (BMI) of 32, 33 kg/m 2 , and an A1c of 7.5% or 8% on metformin . Would you use semaglutide 1 mg (Ozempic, Novo Nordisk) that is indicated for type 2 diabetes, or would you use semaglutide 2.4 mg that is indicated for obesity and risk factors? "We have the answer to that from STEP 2," said Melanie J. Davies, MB ChB, MD, professor of diabetes medicine at the University of Leicester, UK, who led the STEP 2 trial. "For some patients, the 1-mg dose, which we use routinely in the clinic, may be reasonable to get good glycemic control for cardiovascular protection and will obviously achieve some weight loss. But if you really want to go for the weight-related comorbidities, then the 2.4-mg dose is what you need," she said. Dr Melanie J. Davies "A lot of [clinicians] might say: 'I'll see how [the patient goes] with the 1-mg dose, and then maybe if they're not losing the weight and not getting to glycemic target, then maybe I'll switch to 2.4 mg,'" said John Wilding, MD, who leads clinical research into obesity, diabetes, and endocrinology at the University of Liverpool, in the UK, and led the STEP 1 trial. "But the STEP 2 data show very clearly that you get almost the same A1c," Rosenstock interjected. "I would go for 2.4 mg. The patient has a BMI of 32, 33 kg/m 2 . I would hit hard the BMI. We need to change that paradigm." "For other diseases we don't always go to the maximum dose that's available. We go to the dose that's necessary to achieve the clinical endpoint that we want," Kaplan noted. "I think one of the challenges is going to be to learn how to clinically nuance our therapy the way we do for other diseases." "That is the usual thinking," Rosenstock agreed. But "with the 2.4-mg dose, one third get a 20% reduction of BMI, and 10% get almost a 30% reduction — and you [aren't] going to see that with semaglutide 1 mg!" "That's true," Kaplan conceded. However, a patient with a relatively low BMI of 32, 33 kg/m 2 may not need the higher dose, unlike a patient who has a BMI of 45 kg/m 2 and diabetes. But we're going to find that out over the next couple of years, he expects. Case 2 Dr John Wilding You have a patient with a BMI of 31 kg/m 2 who is newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Why should you start them with metformin? Why won't you start them with something that will directly tackle obesity and get the patient to lose 20 pounds and for sure the blood sugar is going to be better? "I think if I have someone who is really keen to put their diabetes into remission," Wilding said, "this would be a fantastic approach because they would have a really high chance of doing that." The prediabetes data from STEP showed that "we can put a lot of people from prediabetes back to normal glucose tolerance," Wilding noted. "Maybe we can put people with early diabetes back to normal as well. I think that's a trial that really does need to be done," he said. "I think you have to remember that of the millions and millions of people with obesity, a very small portion are currently treated with anti-obesity medication, and an even smaller portion are getting bariatric surgery," Kaplan replied. "In the United States, 90% of people who get bariatric surgery are self-referred," he said, so, "I think initially we are not going to see much of a change" in rates of bariatric surgery. 12 3 4 Next
By Gina Mantor 20 Sep, 2022
The clinically proven treatment is a first-of-its-kind technology that simultaneously treats facial muscles, skin and connective tissue.
By Gina Mantor 01 Sep, 2022
Game Changer Technology in Aesthetics Launching Soon
diastasis recti treatment with emsculpt neo
By websitebuilder 30 Jul, 2021
One of the best and newest ways to rid yourself of Diastasis Recti is by completing a series of Emsculpt NEO treatments. Along with improving muscle tone and burning fat, this revolutionary treatment that can also be used to help treat Diastasis Recti.
More Posts
Share by: